San Bernardo

Hola me gustaría me ayuden a saber cómo se llama la raza que es muy parecida al San Bernarndo, gracias.

Hola,muy parecidos son los Terranovas y Mastin tibetanos

Hola, Perplejidad, cuando mecniono la paradoja de Alabama no es porque tema que se pueda reproducir en Madrid ni porque tenga ningfan efecto pre1ctico en ninguna eleccif3n en la que el nfamero de escaf1os este9 prefijado; lo que intento ilustrar con ella es que no se puede decir que el sistema de restos mayores sea *el justo*. Creo que no se puede defender que si yo tengo 2 millones de votos y mis dos rivales, 6 cada uno, en un reparto justo de 10 escaf1os me correspondan 2, pero en un reparto justo de 11 me toque sf3lo 1. A eso me refiero: que cuando se prefiere restos mayores a D'Hondt no basta con decir que D'Hondt es injusto porque en tal ejemplo mira lo que pasa. Restos mayores tampoco es absolutamente justo. De hecho, parece que hay resultados mateme1ticos que indican que no hay, ni puede haber, ninguna ff3rmula electoral (o como se traduzca apportionment en el contexto que nos ocupa) que respete al me1ximo proporcionalidad y sentido comfan. Dice la Wikipedia (artedculo Apportionment paradox en el apartado Impossibility result ) que Balinski y Young demostraron que no se le puede pedir a una ff3rmula electoral simulte1neamente estas tres cosas:(1) Que todos los partidos obtengan un nfamero de escaf1os que se diferencie en menos de una unidad del que les correspondereda por proporcionalidad exacta.(2) Que se evite la paradoja de que, a igual reparto de votos, un mayor nfamero de escaf1os a repartir pueda suponer la pe9rdida de escaf1os en algfan partido.(3) Que se evite la paradoja de que, a igual nfamero de escaf1os a repartir, un partido que gana votos pueda perder un escaf1o frente a otro que pierde votos.Y, si lo he entendido bien, el me9todo de restos mayores garantiza (1) a costa de sufrir las paradojas (2) y (3) [para la faltima no he encontrado un ejemplo nume9rico sencillo], paradojas que D'Hondt evita.

KCcfId ijyqcftmygwj

Paki, aunque con retraso, te comunico que todos los que lo solicist teis a trav s de los coemntarios est is admitidos/as cheap auto insurance online auto insurance quotes

Paki, aunque con retraso, te comunico que todos los que lo solicist teis a trav s de los coemntarios est is admitidos/as free car insurance quotes cheap health insurance

Paki, aunque con retraso, te comunico que todos los que lo solicist teis a trav s de los coemntarios est is admitidos/as cheap california auto insurance new jersey car insurance

I think you’ll find there are extreme views on both sides. The problem is the level of bile on the Unionist side is quite breathtaking: If they are to believed then Scotland has not advanced as a nation in almost 300 years. We’re always 24 hours away from fiscal ruin. Not one of us works or pays taxes, no revenue is generated here, no wealth created. We all live on the good graces of the English. The English pay our way, they pay for our health service, they pay for our educations, they pay our benefits, they pay for our prescription, there is no end to the generosity of the English. You are seeing this more and more often in the English press and not just the right-wing screech monkey red tops like the daily express, but in papers like the Guardian or the Independent.To defend the Union, you are caught on the horns of dilemma. To attack independence is to question the competence of the Scots people to go it alone. Not an easy line to take, and one that will create the sort of pro-independence anger that you speak of. If they try to avoid this, then you get a sort of limp wishy washy nonsense that simply does not resonate or capture the imagination, because it is hearkening back to an ideal that does not exist any more.What angers me, is that the pro-unionists seemingly can’t or won’t defend Scotland against these nonsensical attacks. If they agree with them, then frankly the Union has outlived its usefulness, who in their right mind could defend such a state of affairs if it was true, or if it is a lie, who in all good conscience would be a party to it? Are they perhaps afraid, that if they did stand with Scotland, they could undermine their own arguments? better to stay silent and hope the negativity sways people to our way of thinking? If that is the case, then the Union needs to end – I could not pin my colours to the same mast with these people.I think the Unionists will do their worst and fail to make a positive case for the Union. Nothing I have seen so far, has made me think otherwise. I agree with your last statement, but sadly few Unionists do. bontril nexium plendil flomax propecia

I think there is another issue here – if devolution grows and develops, lets say we opt for devo-max or whatever that is – or gain fiscal autonomy after a fashion – it would I think, make the Union seem less important in peoples minds, not more. “If we’re doing all this by ourselves, what is the Union for?” would be the question being asked.I can see why Ruth Davidson wants to draw a line in the sand, and even declare that for most it is a non-issue – if they lose any more control to the Scottish parliament, then Independence will come, but by the back door so to speak. Murdo Fraser I think, see’s the writing on the wall and wants to position his party to at least be contender should that day come. The other unionist parties are all in a muddle about how to best approach it.So what to do?Attack it too strongly, like taking the line that the Scots are not competent, then you could lose the argument almost by default. If Jim Murphy took the stand with the Tories, then he risks being around when they do something fantastically ill considered, like getting Michael Forsyth or some such rabble rouser from the 80s to be their champion.If you defend Scotland and say of course it could go it alone: Then you risk losing again.I do have laugh at the desperate attempts of the Unionist parties trying to force the issue. I don’t think they have gotten it into their heads that they lost the arguments and lost the election. Someone may correct me, but I don’t the losers get to dictate terms to the victors.It is only right and proper for it wait until the end of this parliamentary session. Gives everyone time to consider all the pros and cons.If you defend Scotland viagra nexium

Coach Outlet Online Coach Outlet Coach Outlet Coach Factory Coach Factory Outlet Coach Outlet Coach Outlet Online Sac Louis Vuitton